This page brings together selected case studies from the RTM research. Each case begins with a documented source record — a message, timestamp, date, image, text, or external datum — and proceeds to the anchors, closures, and relationships found around that record.
The presentation is designed to keep separate what was fixed or documented beforehand, what was derived by calculation, and what was tested with controls. Some cases also include null models, simulations, and search-aware stress tests.
Each card is a gateway to a documented case: source, chronology, architecture, and controls where available.
Seven cases in which the source record was preserved before calculation. Each case presents source, chronology, anchors and closures, with Null controls where applicable.
Six dependency-compressed core structures link the event questions, identities, 17.12, the year 2021 and the ketubah. Two central convergence nodes are each supported by three separate routes — 2337 and 810 — and are evaluated together in the Exact Null.
Amir Harpaz and Ayala Cohen Shapira stayed in room 1602 on floor 16. The date and two identities converge on 4083, the location-description value, and the node returns to both identities.
Two identifiers printed on a 2000 membership card connect to complete-week counts derived from two 2025 measurements. The first route reaches 1312 and returns to 4262; the corrected measurement also returns 4819. The core uses no gematria.
2378 is present in the archived 14 July network; on the next day it becomes the exact value of the full date phrase. The declared gates are then scanned across the full date range.
Titanic, 9/11 and Ford Capri are presented from simple to complex. Titanic now opens with two short foundation closures — 659 → 956 → 1912 and 846 + 62 + 116 = 1024 — before moving to the deeper Millvina Dean network: 2 February 1912 → 972, the 1912 ↔ 1718 loop, and the 11100 → 1509 convergence.
The same structural families recur across several RTM case files. Comparison comes only after each case states its source, fixed inputs and calculation.
Different source routes terminate on the same target or internal node.
The numerical form of a question participates in reconstructing its answer, time or identity.
The network returns the person, name or role that belongs to the event.
The same information moves between numeric form, number words, date or gematria and meets again.
An output returns to an earlier node, or later information reconstructs an earlier state.
Observer replacement, role sensitivity, exhaustive enumeration, Monte Carlo, Null models and dependency compression are pressure tests — not case categories.
This order keeps chronology and researcher degrees of freedom visible. Only then do we compare cases and move to pressure tests.
